Mind reducible to the brain? An argument against.:
Advanced Philosophy Campfire
If ye would like to moderate the Advanced Philosophy
Campfire, please drop becket@jollyroger.com a
line.
Advanced Philosophy & Mind reducible to the brain? An argument against.
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[GREAT
BOOKS: DISCUSS THE
TRAGEDY OF DRAKERAFT.COM][Great Books Lovers Match]
[Physics Forums][Poetry][Shakespeare's Plays][Great Books][Open Source Business]
[Great Books Games][Federalist Papers][Poetry Contest][Classic eCards][Great Books
Forums]
The
World's Largest Literary Cafe
[Nantuckets.com][Business Philosophy][Classicals.com]
[Nantucket
Poetry Postcards]
[The Jolly Roger][Kill Devil Hill][Western Canon University]
[Federalistnavy.com Spirit of
America][Starbuck.com Clical Poetry Port]
[]
[Shakespearean
Greetings]
[nantucketnavy.com][hatteraslight.com]
[ Follow Ups ] [
Post Followup ] [ Advanced Philosophy
Hatteras Campfire ]
[ ]
[The
World's Largest Literary Cafe]
Posted by Noctlillucent on June 14, 19101 at 14:50:42:
Consider this argument:
Let’s ume that one’s consciousness is a product of the brain. If true, we can imagine a physically identical second brain, configured exactly as yours is now. This invokes no logically impossible feat or violation of any physical law.
Now, would you be conscious as the second brain as well? If the physiological theory of the mind were true, the answer would appear to be ‘yes’. The fact the second brain is made of a different set of atoms shouldn’t make any difference because the atoms in your present brain are being constantly replaced, yet you continue to exist. Therefore, so long as the second brain is configured the same way as the first, you should exist in both.
Here’s the problem. Suppose both brains are functioning and one brain is stimulated to create the sensation of severe pain, and the other brain is not stimulated, and so experiences no pain.
Following this theory consistently, you should experience both severe pain and no pain AT THE SAME TIME? That is a logically impossible state.
The physiological theory, then, is caught contradicting itself. And obviously no physical theory of consciousness is true if it can allow for its own contradiction.
Comments?
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
[Poetry]
[Shakespeare]
[Classics]
[Classic eCards]
[American History]
[Great Books]
[Tutors]
[Great Books Forums]
[Greatest Conversation]
[Cairn Studios]
[Great Books & Classics]
Join us before the
mast for
Moby Dick year.
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS
BUY THE GREAT BOOKS
Free postnuke hosting,
blogging, and
online photo
albums @ mobynuke.net
WRITERSWORD.COM
JOLLYROGER.COM US ARMED FORCES PENPALS
THE THREE BOOKS OF THE RENAISSANCE
SUMMER GREAT BOOKS CHALLENGE
Open Source: Free Photo Gallery Hosting for Stock
Photography
Open Source Digital Rights Management for Artists,
Authors, Bands
Free Open Source Blogging & Blog Hosting
Great Books Discussion Forum
Open Source Business
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[Shakespeare Forums]
[Bible Forums]
Feedback? Would you like to moderate a forum? Contact m o b y d i c k m
o v i e @ y a h o o . c o m.
Join The
Renaissance!