Re: HELP! nietzsche's "good" people:
Frederich Nietzsche Campfire
If ye would like to moderate the Frederich Nietzsche
Campfire, please drop becket@jollyroger.com a
line.
Frederich Nietzsche & Re: HELP! nietzsche's "good" people
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
[GREAT
BOOKS: DISCUSS THE
TRAGEDY OF DRAKERAFT.COM][Great Books Lovers Match]
[Physics Forums][Poetry][Shakespeare's Plays][Great Books][Open Source Business]
[Great Books Games][Federalist Papers][Poetry Contest][Classic eCards][Great Books
Forums]
The
World's Largest Literary Cafe
[Nantuckets.com][Business Philosophy][Classicals.com]
[Nantucket
Poetry Postcards]
[The Jolly Roger][Kill Devil Hill][Western Canon University]
[Federalistnavy.com Spirit of
America][Starbuck.com Classical Poetry Port]
[]
[Shakespearean
Greetings]
[nantucketnavy.com][hatteraslight.com]
[ Follow Ups ] [
Post Followup ] [ Frederich Nietzsche
Hatteras Campfire ]
[ ]
[The
World's Largest Literary Cafe]
Posted by heather steffen on April 16, 19101 at 22:13:44:
well, where to start? (for the remainder of this anyone feel free to correct me) here's the basic thing, nietzsche doesn't really think that "good" exists at all. mostly in "Genealogy of Morals" n. does lay out what he thinks "good," "bad," and "evil" actually are...no more than societal constructions, to oversimplify a bit. ok, so n. says that it all starts with the nobles looking at themselves and saying "we are good." thus, from their view all that is not them is the "bad." at this point the "good and bad" were not really valuations, but only social distinctions made by the noble class. ok, so the commoners are bad then. well, they don't like being called that and begin to think of the nobles (the other) as "evil"... this commoner's "evil" is distinct from the noble's "good" in that it now becomes a moralization. at the same time the commoners call themselves the "good." thus the "good" nobles have become "evil" and the "bad" commoners have become "good." so from this VERY VERY simplistic version of n's argument, you can see the problem with asking if nietzsche thinks people should be "good." anyway...for what nietzsche thinks of people, try the third book of "Genealogy" "Zarathustra" and lots of other stuff....he thinks basically that modern man is a "bridge" to the Ubermensch (overman). and thus "should" be neither good nor bad nor evil, but merely seek to affirm life and his will and further the progression to the goal of the Ubermensch. ok, thats all i've got time for, sorry if it is totally wrong or makes no sense. :/
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
[Poetry]
[Shakespeare]
[Classics]
[Classic eCards]
[American History]
[Great Books]
[Tutors]
[Great Books Forums]
[Greatest Conversation]
[Cairn Studios]
[Great Books & Classics]
Join us before the
mast for
Moby Dick year.
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS
BUY THE GREAT BOOKS
Free postnuke hosting,
blogging, and
photo
galleries @ mobynuke.net
THE THREE BOOKS OF THE RENAISSANCE
SUMMER GREAT BOOKS CHALLENGE
JOLLYROGER.COM PENPALS--MEET FELLOW BOOK LOVERS &
FRIENDS
PERSONALS.JOLLYROGER.COM: MEET FINE SPIRITS
Open Source: Free Photo Gallery Hosting for Stock
Photography
Open Source CMS Renaissance & Digital Rights Management
Free Open Source Blogging & Blog Hosting
Great Books Forum
Open Source Business
DR. ELLIOT'S NORTH AMERICAN GREAT BOOKS TOUR--COMING TO A BOOK
STORE NEAR YOU
Feedback? Would you like to moderate a forum? Contact j o l l y r
o g e r
s h i p @ y a h o o . c o m.
Join The
Renaissance!