Posted by Pjk on May 29, 19101 at 13:15:28:
In Reply to: The Sun Also Rises Imagery posted by bb on May 28, 19101 at 19:12:02:
: I need some help in picking the most important image in the novel, and some info on why. Would the bull fight be good? why or why not?
[I have to answer this in an odd way, if you don't mind...]
Yes, it is a very good image if you understand it as a surrogate
for war.
But not war as it had just been fought in all of the battles of the
Great War. (1)
It is an image of war as fought prior to the way the Great War was
fought. (2)
And as such, it is not only an image of the way wars were fought prior to
the great war, but it is also an image of all of the customs and traditions
that existed before he Great War but which people no longer trusted or
believed in as a result of the war.
OK?
Now for a little bit of explanation. Prior to the Great War (World War I),
most wars were fought kind of man-to-man or man-on-a-horse-to-man-on-a-horse.
In other words, the combatants were relatively equal and the better swordsman
you were ot the better shot you were or the better your horse was, the more
chance you had to best your opponant and survive and win the battle and thus
the war. (And I have to say this...this only applies to white men fighting
white men. The Zulus with their spears (asagis) never had a chance
against the British with their rifles. The Cheyanne with their bows and
arrows never had a chance against the settes with their rifles). But
Napoleon's troops rushed at the Russians and they fought with sabres or
hand to hand on a pretty much equal basis.
But what happened during the Great War. Several things. The machine gun
allowed two men to wipe out a hundred attackers, no matter how good the
attackers were. The trench mortor allowed four men to hurl a ton of
explosives five miles and kill several dozen men asleep in a tent. The
ariplane allowed one man to strafe a column of men and animals, killing
most of them. And poison gas, once set loose, could kill hundreds of the
enemy or even the users of the gas...at the wim of the wind. War was
now mechanized and unfair. Practise didn't make you perfect against a
tank. And even prayers before or during battle would save you against
barbed wire. Everyone knew this except it seems the generals, who
continued to order attacks across no-man's-land to take several yards
of mud which would be retaken by the enemy next week.
This kind of fighting, and the huge number of deaths, had a profound
effect on the people who survived. Many didn't see any reason to go back
to the way they used to live, or to continue to trust the institutions
they had one trusted - a government, the church, marriage, etc. So if the
characters in the novel seem to drink too much or don't seem to have a
(except for Jake and Georgette the prostitute), or if they don't
seem to be interested in marriage (Lady Brett) you can start to appreciate
why thay have been so characterized.
But does this mean they have nothing? Not quite. Jake Barnes has the bullfight.
An activity which was 400 years old when the novel was written, 400 years of
traditions and rules by which both the matador and the bull were expected to act.
400 years of one man facing one animal in which the practiced skill of the man
was pitted against the speed and strength of the animal. 400 years of a fair
fight. So not only is the bullfight a surrogate for what war was... something
of a fair fight. it is also a surrogate of a more innocent time. A time when
people had recource to things somehow bigger than themselves - the church, a
government, anything traditional that was ped down from one generation to
another. Anything that was lost in the fighting of the Great War.
hth
Pjk
READ THE GREAT BOOKS
TERM PAPERS, RESEARCH PAPERS, ESSAYS