Subject:

Comments:
: : I became unhappy with the insistence of conventional : : physics that photon decay cannot possibly exist on : : the time scales necessary to account for the well : : doented Hubble Red Shift, and that it was thus necessary to postulate that the universe expands : : since a "big bang" == which seems more likely to : : have occurred in 1945. So I wrote some files on it : : and posted them at my webpage. : : : : I'd like comments or questions regarding what I wrote. : : I tried to be clear and consistent with normal physics. : : Photons do decay--people don't like that, but : : they do have very long half-lives--millions of years : : is a short time but the decay is appropriate to : : explain the Red Shift and it's a simpler explanation : : than universe expansion. But it's not very popular : : as there is a lot of money interest in Doppler : : radar. There are recent attempts to prove that photons : : decay only in a very short time. : : Mike Lewis : : Hosted by N.Benschop since aug-2002 : at http://members.chello.nl/~n.benschop

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: